AikiWeb 02-2011: Reciprocity
Breathe in, react and repeat
Breathe out, respond and resolve
Reciprocity
There was a time when I believed in the normal and natural, constant and continual, momentum and inertia of simple reciprocity. I was able to blame my reactions on other people’s reactions to me. I reflected back to them the same amount of distrust and hostility the dumped on me. I was only polite to give them back what they gave me, wasn’t it? I had heard that we treat others the way we want them to treat us. So if someone treated me, or themselves, or others poorly than it was permission to treat them poorly back, right?
I have always been a bit of the enforcer. If someone came into the Dojo and was playing a bit too rough, I somehow heard about it and found myself in their line thinking that a taste of their own medicine would be just what they needed to mellow out. I could justify it and rationalize it because what I was doing was in the protective interest of those being treated roughly and in their best interest as a learning opportunity. And that philosophy worked until I got into Aikido.
Okay, it worked at first in Aikido too. At least I thought it did. One of my favorite statements from Einstein was that the type of thinking that creates a problem is not the type of thinking that solves it. If given violence and hostility, then more violence and hostility was not going to solve it. It may temporarily postpone further aggression, but it does not solve the problem. In fact, more of the same actually mimics and perpetuates what I am saying I am against. My reactionary reciprocity is not the solution, it is the problem. Many times, they were just reacting to me.
reaction: resistance or opposition to a force, influence, or movement
I hear this all the time from couples in counseling who are in such a reactionary defensive pattern of communication that they do not realize they are perpetuating the aggression and bringing about the demise of a relationship they should be cherishing and embracing. I see it in individuals who justify and rationalize their aggression by saying they learned it from their parents and the society they were raised in. And this is true, we learn much from the models we attach and identify with, even if we don’t do it wisely. Yet, our children then learn it from us and continue our patterns in their own lives and pass it on to our grandchildren. It would appear that reciprocity only repeats and reinforces patterns, it simply does not resolve them.
response: a reply or output resulting from stimulation
responsible: to be called to answer, to explain (not excuse), accountable
Luckily the process of reciprocity is content free, meaning that whatever we put into it we should be able to get out of it. If we put in hostility we will probably get back hostility. If we put in love, we should get back love. What goes around comes around, right? Yet, it doesn’t always work that way either. Many people cannot be provoked to violence because it is not who they are. Many people cannot give you love no matter how much you give them because it is not who they are.
reciprocity: mutual dependence, action, and influence, to return, shared by both sides
Perhaps other people are not creating the hostility of love in us and perhaps we are not creating it in them. Perhaps it is already there and we are just tapping into it. Perhaps we are just picking people who somehow agree with our self and world perception. When I am feeling hostile, all I see and attract is more hostility. When I feel loving, I tend to see people holding hands and being kind to others. But the hostility or love isn’t always reciprocated from the person I thought it would be. Sometimes I got hostility from people I want to love and love from people I was hostile to.
In this reactionary reciprocal pattern, no one is in charge. We are all just on some unconscious automatic pilot repeating past patterns, constructive or destructive. We reciprocate and react in the same vein. Yet, another old saying is that if you always do what you have always done, we will always get what you have always gotten. Violence can only bring about more violence.
The bashing arts were easy because it was more of the same. The same I had grown up in and the same that I was trained in. When I started Aikido it was hard not to react with my usually striking. Even the drills were more competitive than cooperative. Aikido had a congruent philosophy and training methodology of non-resistance and non-violence. It meant I could not react by reciprocating more or the same. It meant that I had to stay mindful to respond with assertion (not aggression) and love (not fear). I had to make a choice in how I was to reciprocate.
As a sempai (and still somewhat of an enforcer) I have an obligation and responsibility to create a safe training environment. That means safe from my aggressive reactions no matter how protective I try to rationalize them. I must model the response I want in others rather than have them dictate to me how I will reciprocate. I must not let my past or other people decide who I am, on or off the mat. That is my decision.
The choice is, do I want to reciprocate from my reactions and repeat the pattern or do I want to respond effectively and efficiently to resolve the matter with the least amount of effort and damage/ The choice is the intent behind my training and my life. It’s a choice we all have.
Breathe in, react and repeat
Breathe out, respond and resolve
Reciprocity
Thanks for listening, for the opportunity to be of service, and for sharing the journey. Now get back to training. KWATZ!